Stacking for Different Objectives Part 1: Anti-Beta
Overview
This post explains how an “anti‑beta” stack can potentially narrow the depth and duration of portfolio drawdowns by adding a 20 percent overlay of diversifying strategies to a traditional 60 / 40 portfolio. It reviews three optimization lenses – correlation, Ulcer Ratio, and downside capture – and compares their simulated results.
Key Topics
Diversification, Risk Management, Return Stacking, Portfolio Construction
Introduction
For decades, the 60 / 40 portfolio has served as a convenient balance between growth and stability, but inflation shocks and synchronized equity‑bond sell‑offs have revealed its vulnerability to deep drawdowns.
Rather than abandon the familiar core, many advisors now lean on return stacking – using modest leverage to layer differentiated return streams on top. The Anti‑Beta stack is the first of three applications we will explore in this three-part series: by adding up to a 20% stack of strategies or assets that exhibit diversifying benefits to both equities and bonds, it seeks to blunt the impact of market sell‑offs and shorten the journey back to breakeven.
Explicit hedging operates within the Cost-Certainty-Capture Trilemma: investors pick two and the other is set. Cost is how expensive the hedge is. Certainty is the reliability that the hedge will work. Capture tells us how bad things have to get before the hedge kicks in.
For example, hedges that protect at the first dollar of loss with a high certainty of payoff will have a high cost. On the other hand, hedges that have a low cost and high certainty usually are only protecting against steep losses.
In the pursuit of Anti-Beta stacks without high costs of carry, we will focus on blending a diversified set of assets and strategies – many of which have historically offered positive average returns – that each have their own levels of certainty and capture.
1. Correlation‑Optimized Stack
The first design minimizes the correlation between the overlay and the 60 / 40 core. Allocations tilt toward return streams that have historically remained disconnected – even negatively correlated – from the main portfolio, potentially improving diversification while keeping overall volatility in check.
Figure 1: Correlation-Optimized Stack Allocations
Source: Bloomberg, PivotalPath. Calculations by Newfound Research. For illustrative purposes only. See Appendix A for index definitions. The information is presented for educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell any securities.
2. Ulcer Ratio‑Optimized Stack
The second approach targets the portfolio Ulcer Ratio, a metric that captures both the depth and the length of drawdowns. By favoring exposures that recover swiftly after setbacks, it seeks a smoother path that can help clients stay invested during stressful periods.
Figure 2: Ulcer Ratio-Optimized Stack Allocations
Source: Bloomberg, PivotalPath. Calculations by Newfound Research. For illustrative purposes only. See Appendix A for index definitions. The information is presented for educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell any securities.
Register for our Advisor Center
Tools Center:
Easily backtest & explore different return stacking concepts
Model Portfolios:
Return stacked allocations, commentary and guidance designed
for a range of client risk profiles and goals
Future Thinking:
Receive up-to-date insights into the world of return stacking theory and practice
3. Downside Capture‑Optimized Stack
The third variation explicitly reduces downside capture relative to the benchmark. It emphasizes allocations that have held up well in adverse equity and/or bond environments, providing targeted protection when losses matter most. While we focused on universal drawdown capture (including small drawdowns), this framework could be adapted to emphasize the most severe drawdowns in the simulations.
Figure 3: Downside Capture-Optimized Stack Allocations
Source: Bloomberg, PivotalPath. Calculations by Newfound Research. For illustrative purposes only. See Appendix A for index definitions. The information is presented for educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell any securities.
Comparing the Approaches
Although all three stacks aim to buttress the portfolio against large losses, they excel in different circumstances. Correlation optimization usually delivers the steadiest ride, Ulcer Ratio optimization shortens recovery time, and downside capture optimization offers the strongest defense in deep bear markets. Simulated results highlight these trade‑offs and help advisors match stack profiles to client tolerance and time horizon.
Figure 4: Anti-Beta Stack Allocations
Source: Bloomberg, PivotalPath. Calculations by Newfound Research. For illustrative purposes only. See Appendix A for index definitions. The information is presented for educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell any securities.
Figure 5: Cumulative Excess Returns of Anti-Beta Stacks
Source: Bloomberg, PivotalPath. Calculations by Newfound Research. For illustrative purposes only. See Appendix A for index definitions. Returns assume the reinvestment of all distributions. Returns are gross of all fees. PivotalPath Indices are net of management fees. Performance is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any actual portfolio. Hypothetical performance is subject to inherent limitations and should not be relied upon to make investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Figure 6: Anti-Beta Risk and Return Statistics
Source: Bloomberg, PivotalPath. Calculations by Newfound Research. For illustrative purposes only. See Appendix A for index definitions. Returns assume the reinvestment of all distributions. Returns are gross of all fees. PivotalPath Indices are net of management fees. Performance is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any actual portfolio. Hypothetical performance is subject to inherent limitations and should not be relied upon to make investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Figure 7: Performance During Major 60/40 Drawdowns
Source: Bloomberg, PivotalPath. Calculations by Newfound Research. For illustrative purposes only. See Appendix A for index definitions. Returns assume the reinvestment of all distributions. Returns are gross of all fees. PivotalPath Indices are net of management fees. Performance is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any actual portfolio. Hypothetical performance is subject to inherent limitations and should not be relied upon to make investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
While the simulated optimizations provide a useful lens for portfolio design, it is important to set expectations around their application. Because the process is calibrated on simulated data to enhance robustness, realized history may not always align neatly with the backtests, and outcomes may appear less favorable in hindsight. Moreover, not all drawdowns are alike; over-fitting to specific episodes such as 2008 or 2022 risks diluting protection against the future downturns, which may manifest differently.
Finally, the analysis here deliberately constrained the overlay to 20%. For an overlay to meaningfully offset large drawdowns, the size would need to be increased or the portfolio would need to incorporate assets with more explicit hedging properties, such as tail risk strategies. To illustrate, if an overlay gained 30% in 2008 but was limited to a 20% allocation, it would contribute only 600 basis points to the portfolio. As emphasized in the introduction, diversification and hedging exist within the cost, certainty, and capture trilemma, and these trade-offs must be recognized when setting expectations for performance.`
Conclusion
Return stacking provides a modern, research‑driven framework to potentially strengthen traditional portfolios through intentional overlays. This post explored the Anti‑Beta sleeve, examining correlation, Ulcer Ratio, and downside‑capture optimizations to demonstrate how a compact, low‑beta layer may curb drawdown depth and speed recovery without dismantling a familiar 60 / 40 core.
Because the overlay remains deliberately modest, at 20%, it preserves the simplicity advisors value and helps connect portfolio design directly to client concerns about market stress.
In Part 2, we will look at how a stack can be assembled under an absolute return framework, seeking consistent performance across market cycles.
Appendix A: Index Definitions
Global Equities: MSCI ACWI Net Return Index USD. The MSCI ACWI Index captures large and mid-cap representation across 23 Developed Markets (DM) and 24 Emerging Markets (EM) countries*. With 2,884 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the global investable equity opportunity set.
U.S. Core Fixed Income: Bloomberg US Agg Total Return Value Unhedged USD. The Bloomberg US Agg Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. The index includes Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, MBS (agency fixed-rate pass-throughs), ABS and CMBS (agency and non-agency).
TIPS: Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation Notes TR Index Value Unhedged USD. The Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L) measures the performance of the US Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) market. Federal Reserve holdings of US TIPS are not index eligible and are excluded from the face amount outstanding of each bond in the index.
High Yield Fixed Income: Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index Value Unhedged USD. The Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. Bonds from issuers with an emerging markets country of risk, based on Bloomberg EM country definition, are excluded.
Commodities: S&P GSCI Index Spot Index. The S&P GSCI® is widely recognized as a leading measure of general price movements and inflation in the world economy. It provides investors with a reliable and publicly available benchmark for investment performance in the commodity markets.
Gold: XAU Currency. Gold spot price quoted in USD per ounce.
Real Estate: Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Total Return Index. The Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index tracks the performance of publicly traded REITs and REIT-like securities and is designed to serve as a proxy for direct real estate investment, in part by excluding companies whose performance may be driven by factors other than the value of real estate. The index is a subset of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Real Estate Securities Index (RESI), which represents equity real estate investment trusts (REITs), and real estate operating companies (REOCs) traded in the U.S.
Merger Arbitrage: PivotalPath Event Driven : Merger Arbitrage Index. The PivotalPath Event Driven: Merger Arbitrage Hedge Fund Index is an equal weighted index which comprises funds that typically purchase shares in one company and short sell the assets in another. The strategy is generally used in the expectation of a pending announcement of a company takeover, where the fund will take a long position in the target firm and a short position in the acquiring firm. The Index tracks the monthly performance, net of fees in USD, of its constituents with a minimum fund track record of 18 months and a minimum fund AUM of $50mm. The constituents are fixed at the end each calendar year for the following calendar year.
Managed Futures: PivotalPath Managed Futures Index. The PivotalPath Managed Futures Hedge Fund Index is an equal weighted index of funds that typically forecast market trends and determine whether to invest long or short in futures contracts across metals, grains, equity indices and soft commodities, as well as foreign currency and U.S. government bond futures. The Index tracks the monthly performance, net of fees in USD, of its constituents and is representative of funds with a minimum fund track record of 18 months and a minimum fund AUM of $50mm. The constituents are fixed at the end each calendar year for the following calendar year.
Systematic Global Macro: PivotalPath Global Macro: Quantitative Index. The PivotalPath Global Macro: Quantitative Hedge Fund Index is an equal weighted index which comprises funds that typically use a quantitative approach to systematically invest across multiple geographies and asset classes. The Index tracks the monthly performance, net of fees in USD, of its constituents with a minimum fund track record of 18 months and a minimum fund AUM of $50mm. The constituents are fixed at the end each calendar year for the following calendar year.
CPI: Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Averages (CPIAUCSL). The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items (CPIAUCSL) is a price index of a basket of goods and services paid by urban consumers. It can also represent the buying habits of urban consumers. This particular index includes roughly 88 percent of the total population, accounting for wage earners, clerical workers, technical workers, self-employed, short-term workers, unemployed, retirees, and those not in the labor force.
One-Year Ahead CPI Inflation Forecast (INFCPI1YR): This series reflects the median forecast for average Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation over the four quarters following the survey quarter. It is derived from the Survey of Professional Forecasters and is calculated using the geometric average of quarter-over-quarter median CPI inflation forecasts.
The PivotalPath index/indices used in this information is/are produced by the hedge fund research and investment consultancy firm, PivotalPath Inc. The information is representative of the overall composition of the hedge fund universe, as well as specific sub-strategies, including but not limited to the PivotalPath Hedge Fund Composite Index; the PivotalPath Credit Index (and associated sub-indices); the PivotalPath Equity Diversified Index (and associated subindices); the PivotalPath Equity Sector Index (and associated sub-indices); the PivotalPath Event Driven Index (and associated sub-indices); the PivotalPath Global Macro Index (and associated sub-indices); the PivotalPath Managed Futures Index; the PivotalPath Multi-Strategy Index; PivotalPath Equity Quant Index; and the PivotalPath Volatility Index.
PivotalPath Indices are the proprietary product of PivotalPath Inc. They represent Hedge Fund Indices based on collected data from individual hedge funds and while PivotalPath considers the sources of such information and data to be reliable, such information and data has been verified but has not been audited by PivotalPath. No representation is made as to, and no responsibility or liability is accepted for, the accuracy or completeness of such information and data. PivotalPath Index constituents may be removed at any time and any PivotalPath index may be restated, adjusted, or corrected at any time without notice.
PivotalPath data is being used under license from PivotalPath, Inc, which does not approve of or endorse any of the products or the contents discussed in these materials.
The portfolio optimizations presented throughout this paper are based on a simulation-driven framework designed to reflect realistic market behavior. Specifically, we employ a block-bootstrap methodology that aims to preserve key time-series and cross-sectional dynamics observed in asset class returns.
For each simulation, return series are aligned by calendar month. To generate a 10-year simulation period, we randomly select 20 non-overlapping 6-month return blocks. The initial block is chosen at random, while subsequent blocks are selected using a normally distributed jump process. Each new block start date is determined by adding a normally distributed random variable (centered at zero with a standard deviation of 36 months) to the prior block’s start date. This approach allows for more realistic regime persistence and transition dynamics than uniform bootstrapping.
An optimal stack is then computed for each simulated path, allowing up to a 20% total stack allocation. Final allocations are determined by averaging the portfolio weights across all simulations. Approximately 300 simulations are generated, with the resulting portfolio being the average of the optimized results across simulations.
This methodology helps preserve empirically observed characteristics such as autocorrelation, autoregressive and heteroskedastic volatility patterns, and time-varying cross-asset correlations, key features that are often lost in naïve or overly simplified simulation approaches.