Return Stacked® Academic Review
Demystifying Time-Series Momentum Strategies: Volatility Estimators, Trading Rules, and Pairwise Correlations
Authors
Nick Baltas and Robert Kosowski
Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds, 2013, Volume 19, Issue 4, pages 289-310
Demystifying Time-Series Momentum Strategies
Key Topics
return stacking, portable alpha, diversification, leverage, managed futures, trend following, carry, bonds, equities, yield, risk management, portfolio construction, capital efficiency
Unveiling the Mechanics of Time-Series Momentum
Time-series momentum, commonly known as trend following, has been a cornerstone strategy in quantitative finance, attracting substantial interest for its potential to capture persistent price movements across various asset classes. This strategy exploits the tendency of asset prices to continue moving in the same direction, leveraging serial correlations in returns to generate profits. Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) and managed futures funds, managing hundreds of billions of dollars collectively, often employ systematic trend-following strategies across equities, commodities, government bonds, and currencies.
In their seminal paper, “Demystifying Time-Series Momentum Strategies: Volatility Estimators, Trading Rules, and Pairwise Correlations,” Nick Baltas and Robert Kosowski delve deep into the mechanics of time-series momentum strategies. They aim to enhance the understanding and implementation of these strategies by examining the impact of volatility estimation methods, trading rule designs, and the role of asset correlations.
Refining Volatility Estimators and Trading Rules
The authors propose using the Yang and Zhang (2000) range-based volatility estimator, which incorporates open, high, low, and close prices to provide a more accurate measure of an asset’s true volatility. By capturing more information about price movements within a trading period, this estimator reduces noise and the need for frequent rebalancing. Empirical results show that utilizing the Yang-Zhang estimator reduces portfolio turnover by approximately 17% without a statistically significant impact on performance.
In terms of trading rules, Baltas and Kosowski compare the standard binary approach, which signals a full long or short position based on the sign of past returns, with a more nuanced “TREND” rule. The TREND rule scales positions according to the statistical strength of the observed price trends, reducing exposure to assets with weaker signals. This approach smooths the transition between positions and further reduces portfolio turnover by about 24%, again without compromising performance.
The Importance of Pairwise Correlations
Baltas and Kosowski introduce a correlation-adjusted variant of the time-series momentum strategy. This model dynamically adjusts the leverage applied to each asset based on the average pairwise signed correlation within the portfolio. By reducing leverage during periods of high average correlation, the strategy aims to mitigate the risk of significant drawdowns.
Figure 1: Average Pairwise Correlations (Original: Figure 8)
Evaluating Performance and Transaction Costs
Their findings reveal that the traditional time-series momentum strategy incurs trading costs amounting to approximately 10% of its gross returns over a 30-year period. By implementing the Yang-Zhang volatility estimator and the TREND trading rule, these costs can be reduced by about 35%. The correlation-adjusted strategy further enhances risk-adjusted returns, particularly during periods of high market stress.
Table 2: Performance of Time-Series Momentum Strategies with Correlation Adjustment (Original: Table IV)
Implications for Return Stacked Portfolio Solutions
Implementing these refined time-series momentum strategies can complement other alternative investment strategies, such as those discussed in Trend Following and Portable Alpha. For instance, a trend-following component that adjusts for volatility and correlations can be stacked with other strategies like merger arbitrage or carry to achieve a more robust and diversified return profile.
Moreover, incorporating correlation adjustments echoes the principles of Diversification 2.0, where understanding and managing inter-asset relationships are paramount. By dynamically adjusting exposures based on the correlation environment, investors can better navigate periods of market stress, enhancing the resilience of return stacked portfolios.
Conclusion
Their findings underscore the importance of refining traditional approaches to reduce transaction costs and manage risks effectively. For practitioners and investors engaged in return stacking, these insights provide a framework for constructing more resilient and diversified portfolios, ultimately aiming for superior risk-adjusted returns in complex financial markets.